Tim Bednar wrote an interesting and provoking paper titled 'We Know More Than Our Pastors: Why Bloggers Are the Vanguard of the Participatory Church'. He explores how Christians are using blogging for spiritual formation and how they are redefining the scope of Martin Luther's 'the priesthood of the believer'. Bednar states: "As a network, we know more than our pastors. Thousands of bloggers circumvent established hierarchies and relate unmediated with one another. We are part of a participatory phenomenon that is impacting mass media, technology, education, entertainment, politics, journalism, business - and the church."
Bloggers take an active role in their personal spiritual formation, and they expect to co-create the church, very much like an open-source operating system. When they blog and interact with other believers on the internet, they experience community. Blogging has become a spiritual practice that uniquely combines writing, learning, conversation, community and prayer with an abiding incarnational mission. Like blogger Jordon Cooper says: "There is a reason we flock online. There is people, interaction, and community here that in many ways is more real (authentic) than in the offline world."
In the cyberchurch there is no authority that determines what is 'in' and what is 'out'. Truth is discovered as we live, link and blog in community. Like Steve Collins explains: "Closed set churches and believers have a 'territorial' concept of God's kingdom, enclosed within a boundary. Membership comes through crossing the boundary in an act of conversion. Once inside Kingdom territory, care must be taken not to cross the boundary again. An open set on the other hand has no 'territorial' boundary, but is defined by relationship with a centre (Jesus): all that is moving towards the centre, seeking relationship, belongs; all that is moving away, abandoning relationship, does not."
Blogging is not (yet) Heaven. In his paper, Bednar also dedicates a chapter to warnings, pitfalls and hype related to blogging, like vanity and groupthink. And he addresses some of the issues pastors would be concerned about, like discord and orthodoxy.
What does the blogging phenomenon mean for the church? The key is Bednar's observation that the culture is shifting from passive consumerism to participative producerism. "44% of internet users have created content for the online world through building or posting to websites, creating blogs, and sharing files. Whether the existing church likes it or not, we are giving birth to a generation of people who view themselves as participants." Some of the consequences are:
- The traditional church conceives of itself as an exclusive community and determines who is 'saved' and 'unsaved'. It believes that it owns these definitions. This is no longer true. Christianity is an open conversation by those following Christ. Those involved in the conversation define the terms, not the church-as-we-know-it.
- Christians no longer pursue spiritual formation within the bounds of a single tradition, church, pastor or denomination. We are having hyperlinked conversations that subvert traditional hierarchies.
- Every Christian is a creator. We no longer have to wait for church authorization to think or act or speak in the name of Christ.
- Christians belong to multiple congregations.
- Pastors emerge by building a reputation from within the congregation based on consistency and transparency. Pastors add value to congregations as they add connectedness. Successful pastors and churches of the future will enter into co-creative covenants that help/enable Christians to embrace emergence and foster learning. They do not see themselves as gatekeepers or arbiters of membership in the church.
- Pastors are not primarily preachers. Sermons are no longer teachings, but learning experiences. The goal of preaching is to learn, not teach.
- Relational authenticity and longevity (not attendance) equals success in the participatory church.
- Congregations are their own watchdogs because they are the real stakeholders. Churches and pastors no longer need to screen their congregations for orthodoxy, arbitrate membership or filter their conversation. Orthodoxy will emerge. It is not determined by a single source, but is distributed throughout the congregation. Neil Cole, a leader in the organic church movement observes, "The best solution to heresy in the church is not to have better-trained leaders in 'the pulpits', but better-trained people in 'the pews'."
Will blogging and other forms of internet participation change the church? Feel free to comment on this posting.