Sometimes people try to label me and categorize me in one of their 'church flavour boxes'. When this happens, I tend to give them a hard time. The question "To what church do you belong?" is an easy one. I use to reply: "To the only church there is - the church of Jesus Christ, as expressed 'locally' in my city and social network". When I'm in a funny mood, I might answer that I'm an Evangeliformed Baptolic with a PenteBrethren background. And when I really want to give them a bad day, I'd say I'm unchurched and that I don't show up anymore in George Barna's statistics. ;-)
Another boring question is "What is your ministry"? After all these years I still haven't figured out how to properly describe my ministry. "Following Jesus" might be a fair answer, though I'm afraid that in terms of character and miracle stuff I'm not even close to that. "Trying to keep up with God's worldwide wonders" is another one. Or "Hearing from God and acting upon it." Sounds at least challenging.
More and more people feel uncomfortable being labelled and categorized. And the problem is not so much brands as an expression of unique character, that's OK, but the imperialism and market control that often come with it. I'm convinced that Naomi Klein's book 'NoLogo' also contains a prophetic message for the Church. The practice of labelling is often used to control people, keep them in our camp, secure our market share, and mask our insecurity to deal with folks who don't fit our grid.
Yesterday a Reformed pastor-friend tried to put me in a Charismatic box. I asked him: "Is it possible to effectively follow Christ, pray and minister to people without being inhabited by the Holy Spirit?" It's a non-issue, really. Of course he wanted to know whether I'm mainly connecting with Christians from a Charismatic church background. And of course I'm not, otherwise I wouldn't have tea with a Reformed pastor. I've always had friends in a wide spectrum of the Body. And I draw inspiration from different 'streams of life' in the historic and universal church.
Somehow denominations, intentionally or not, are keeping the Body separated and thus powerless. We are locked up in our church structures, church doctrines and church buildings. On conferences, in student unions, inter-church prayer groups, and city-wide celebrations and evangelism campaigns we suddenly realize we are one in Christ and truly enjoy the fellowship. But then the next Sunday we move back into our separate church castles again. Jesus foresaw this when He prayed for unity (John 17). Paul foresaw this when he warned against denominationalism (see 1 Cor. 1:9-13, 1 Cor. 3). He basically states that this is carnal behaviour and laying another foundation than Christ - so denominationalism is essentially anti-Christ.
I guess I'm not the only one these days who finds congregational and denominational boundaries a nuisance. We tend to say: "But we are one in the Spirit", while at the same time holding onto our petty theologies and different church structures that effectively box people in. I believe it's time to model something new (or actually ancient): there's only one Church in Jesus Christ, and we simply don't have the right to invent 'church membership' as a way to decide who is in and who is out... It's a form of spiritual racism. Paul speaks of being 'in Christ' as the only criterium that matters.
Besides, most denominational labels don't have real substance anyway. We all know that Full Gospel churches have a pretty shallow theology and are not really known as powerhouses of the Holy Spirit. We all know that Reformed churches are not really in the business of reformation and change anymore. We all know that Baptists do much more than just baptizing people. Real followers of Christ don't need labels. If we do get labelled, it's by people who observe us and are blown away because they see Christ in us. That's where the term 'Christians' came from after all (Acts 11:26).